As This Play Was DESIGNED, If The Zero Isolationists Didn't Call Out the Plot Holes In Her Background FIRST, Those Asking For Virus Proof Would Have Gone Right Down In Flames Along With Her
Brillianty stated. And it's happening exactly on cue with Kirsch's latest post, where he claims that because Wagh is a fraud so are all the "virus deniers' (his term of propaganda):
You can set a watch by these tactics. These plays are so incredibly obvious.
This is why it was important for everyone who was involved from the start to call it out quickly.
Had this been left to go on without raising appropriate questions, the always incompetent and often complicit media would have continued to boost her into a cult of personality synonymous with the zero isolation argument so that when finally the potential discrepancies in her story were "uncovered" she would have been so enmeshed with the zero isolation argument that the entire argument would have, by design, gone down in flames right along with her reputation.
The fact that some are trying to wave this conflation around now as some kind of "proof" of the lack of veracity of the entire argument on top of the dying embers of the media play that was being created here only goes to further prove the point of what was meant to occur had more time passed without the reveal.
To be honest, it's a lame strategy and not very bright. Everyone sees right through it.
Despite the fact that there are many geniuses arguing that the virus was never isolated, it does not take a genius to see that this was a potential set up and to question it openly, asking for transparency. This play in the making was very easy to see. I'm glad that so many people decided to point it out before any real damage was done.
I found you today! Thank you. I like your thinking. I've subscribed.
Thank you so much! Welcome!
https://moonmaiden.substack.com/p/is-fuellmich-positioning-to-prop
Brillianty stated. And it's happening exactly on cue with Kirsch's latest post, where he claims that because Wagh is a fraud so are all the "virus deniers' (his term of propaganda):
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/eric-coppolino-exposes-poornima-wagh
Thank you. I appreciate it.
You can set a watch by these tactics. These plays are so incredibly obvious.
This is why it was important for everyone who was involved from the start to call it out quickly.
Had this been left to go on without raising appropriate questions, the always incompetent and often complicit media would have continued to boost her into a cult of personality synonymous with the zero isolation argument so that when finally the potential discrepancies in her story were "uncovered" she would have been so enmeshed with the zero isolation argument that the entire argument would have, by design, gone down in flames right along with her reputation.
The fact that some are trying to wave this conflation around now as some kind of "proof" of the lack of veracity of the entire argument on top of the dying embers of the media play that was being created here only goes to further prove the point of what was meant to occur had more time passed without the reveal.
To be honest, it's a lame strategy and not very bright. Everyone sees right through it.
Despite the fact that there are many geniuses arguing that the virus was never isolated, it does not take a genius to see that this was a potential set up and to question it openly, asking for transparency. This play in the making was very easy to see. I'm glad that so many people decided to point it out before any real damage was done.
I laid this out a bit here: https://moonmaiden.substack.com/p/is-fuellmich-positioning-to-prop
Beautifully done!
A great article as well. I would have said so there also, but it seems not to allow comments.